Banks need to get more granular on risk

Financial Times

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The writer is a UK bank regulatory lawyer     

Banks are in the business of managing risk. To do so, they should have the fullest picture possible of where the potential pitfalls lie in their operations.

Yet in recent remarks, Elizabeth McCaul of the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank highlighted weaknesses in data aggregation and risk reporting by banks. She said that many banks had not paid enough attention to this topic.

This points to a wider problem that regulators, managements and investors need to address. Existing bank rules, worldwide, require the gathering of data without sufficient granularity.

The data currently collected and reported to the regulators provides a snapshot of a “point in time”. This does not allow for a comprehensive, holistic evaluation of actual risk, even in aggregate, as the data is not continuous and not detailed enough.

Given the complexity of the regulatory environment, many banks are managing their liquidity and other calculations in line with the requirements of the relevant regulations and no more. The regulators know this and insist on additional capital to compensate.

The market then discounts the value of banks because liquidity problems and other risks can clearly be missed, as was seen in the cases of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse. This is one of the key reasons why the market value of most European banks is at, below or barely above their book value; and in the US, their market value is (with some notable exceptions) barely higher than that.

The current regulations arose from the global financial crisis of 2008, when the world’s regulators required significant increases in risk-absorbing capital and better management of liquidity. Most bank regulations are designed to address risks arising from banks’ essential functions, including so-called “maturity transformation”. Banks borrow on a short-term basis, often through deposits, and lend for the longer term in significant amounts. This exposes them to the possibility of having hurriedly to borrow or otherwise find monies to meet demands for repayment.

Also, trading positions and collateral calls on derivatives can lead to abrupt demands for cash. There is a separate possibility of a default on banks’ assets, such as loans. In extreme situations, banks can fall victim to a “run”, whereby substantial numbers of short-term depositors and other claimants call for their monies all at once. This problem has become

The full article is available here. This article was published at FT Markets.