Partners Group opens seventh Asian office in Hong Kong

Global private markets firm Partners Group has opened an office in Hong Kong, marking its seventh office in Asia and bringing its total number of offices worldwide to 21.  

The Hong Kong office will be led by Henry Chui, who will continue in his role as Head of Private Wealth APAC. Chui will manage a dedicated team focusing on the firm’s client activities in Hong Kong and the Greater China Area. 

According to a press statement, the team’s priority will be expanding the firm’s private wealth client base by adding strategic distribution partners locally for its private markets solutions, including its evergreen funds.  

Partners Group first established its presence in Asia in 2004 with the opening of its Singapore office, which serves as the firm’s regional headquarters. Partners Group employs more than 550 across Manila, Mumbai, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore and Tokyo. 

South Korea’s Gas Gamble Risks Stranded Assets

IEEFA Energy Finance Specialist Michelle Kim explains why the country’s East Sea gas development will not strengthen its energy security.

South Korea’s Yoon Suk-yeol administration recently announced the exploratory drilling of potentially massive oil and gas reserves in the East Sea, estimated to hold up to 14 billion barrels of oil and gas. This project aims to address the country’s natural gas demand for 29 years and oil demand for four years.

The government will launch the project, which costs around ₩100 billion (US$73 million), by the end of the year, with initial results expected in the first half of 2025. However, as South Korea’s natural gas demand declines, large oil and gas developments in the East Sea could become stranded assets due to the country’s accelerating decarbonisation efforts.

In the long term, the transition to clean energy will better support national energy security and sustainability rather than an overreliance on fossil fuels.

Declining gas demand amid energy transition

By the time the East Sea gas field becomes commercially operational around 2035, South Korea’s natural gas demand will have significantly decreased due to the energy transition. The country’s natural gas demand is already declining, falling 4.9% in 2023 due to higher nuclear and renewable power generation and reduced city gas demand, impacted by high import costs.

Given South Korea’s strengthened decarbonisation targets, this trend will persist in the coming years. The recent 11th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand (BPLE) implementation guideline indicated that the share of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the power mix will decline to 11.1% by 2038, a substantial drop from 26.8% in 2023.

South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy also estimates that natural gas demand will decline to 37.66 million metric tons per annum (MTPA) by 2036, with an average annual decline of 1.38%, due to a shrinking population and slowing economic growth rates.

In addition, the global natural gas market is expected to face an oversupply from 2026 onwards, driven by massive expansions from the US and Qatar. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) estimates that the world’s total nameplate liquefaction capacity could reach 666.5 MTPA by 2028. This suggests that cheap natural gas supply will be available in the market, with existing contracts and purchases from the glutted spot market able to cover future gas needs.

Growing stranded asset risks

Investing taxpayers’ money

HANetf and EMQQ upgrade Emerging Markets Internet ETF to Article 8

As part of the upgrade, the ETF was renamed to EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet UCITS ETF, and its exposure to Chinese equities was capped at 45%. The reclassification followed EMQQ’s inclusion of an ESG screen to the fund, which will also be reflected in its change of name. The decision to limit investments in Chinese equities was made in light of plans to broaden the ETF’s exposure and capture a range of global emerging and developing markets. In addition to the cap on Chinese equities, investments in the South Korean market are also capped at 10%. HANetf to drop fossil fuel exclus…

What Does The Bank of England’s Delayed Rate Cut Imply For US?

If the Bank of England’s decision on Thursday to leave interest rates unchanged is a guide, the outlook for the start date for a US rate cut may be further down the line than generally assumed.

There are many differences between the UK and US economy and so sizing up BoE policy decisions with the Federal Reserve is an apples and oranges comparison on several fronts. Yet it’s hard to overlook the fact that the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street left its target rate unchanged, at 5.25% on Thursday (June 20), despite a return of UK inflation to the central bank’s 2% target in May, reported the day before.

It’s also striking that UK inflation is well below the equivalent for the US. Naively extrapolating the difference as a guide to the future suggests that the Fed’s rate cut is nowhere on the near-term horizon – a guesstimate that contrasts with market expectations in the US.

But England isn’t America and the crowd evaluates the macro outlook quite differently for the US, and rightly so. Nonetheless, there’s still room for debate on guesstimates on timing for the first Fed rate cut. Fed funds futures are currently estimating an implied 66% probability that the Sep. 18 FOMC meeting will mark the first announcement of policy easing. The obvious caveat: US investors have been pricing in moderate odds for rate cuts for much of the past year, only to be disabused of that forecast, time and time again.

Is this time different? No one knows, but the BoE’s decision surely offers another reason to stay cautious on expecting US rate cuts will arrive sooner rather than later. Indeed, despite a clear sign that UK inflation has returned to target, the central bank remains reluctant to embrace a dovish pivot.

“It’s good news that inflation has returned to our 2 per cent target,” notes Andrew Bailey, BoE’s governor. “We need to be sure that inflation will stay low and that’s why we’ve decided to hold rates at 5.25 per cent for now.”

Learn To Use R For Portfolio Analysis
Quantitative Investment Portfolio Analytics In R:
An Introduction To R For Modeling Portfolio Risk and Return

By James Picerno

The key question: Will the Fed be similarly cautious? At least one voting member of the FOMC is leaning in that direction. Thomas Barkin, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, told

JLEN Environmental Assets faces discontinuation vote following further NAV dip

In its annual results published today (21 June), the trust’s NAV dropped to £751.2m in the year ending 31 March 2024, down from £814.6m recorded a year before. Similarly, NAV per share was down to 113.6p from 123.1p. However, JLEN attributed the fall to dividend payments to shareholders, which were “in line” with the trust’s target.  The drop in NAV came on the back of lower power price forecasts, a change in outlook for battery revenues and increases in discount rates. As a result, the trust will face a discontinuation vote at the upcoming annual general meeting in September, when th…

Home REIT sells further 133 properties at 7.8% below draft values

In a London Stock Exchange notice today (21 June), the trust said the gross proceeds from the sales totalled £11.4m – which represented 3.7% of Home’s portfolio by value. The proceeds, however, were 7.8% below the draft values set out in August 2023. Since then, the trust completed the sale of 774 properties and exchanged on an additional 205, with gross proceeds of £137m, which in aggregate are in line with the August 2023 draft valuations, Home noted. Home REIT eyes further property sales to repay Scottish Widows loan The latest sales come after Home REIT failed to secure a new l…

Retail investors flee UK fund market as London continues to suffer

According to data by the Investment Association, April marked the largest withdrawal of investment by retail investors since February 2023, with outflows of over £1.3bn. UK All Companies suffered £996m outflows, while UK Equity Income lost £283m and UK Smaller Companies saw £57m being withdrawn. UK funds have not seen net inflows since the mid pandemic era (July 2021), meaning the UK has undergone the largest net outflow of any geography in every month since August 2021. However, Man GLG Income fund received the third highest inflows of £225m, which “contrasts with broader outflows…

From Macro to Micro

Emilio Barucci, Professor of Financial Mathematics at Politecnico di Milano, says more advanced and sophisticated climate risk models are needed to support ESG investing.

ESG investing focuses on investment processes and products that take into account the ESG features of stocks, bonds and mutual funds. The growth of ESG investing, in terms of assets under management, is driven both by investors, whose activities are affected by factors not limited to economic performance, and therefore to the risk-return trade-off, and by regulation aiming to promote sustainable investment and financial products as part of the green transition.

The relationship between ESG and economic performance

The three pillars of ESG look quite different along two dimensions at least. First of all, the indicators capturing ESG features are different in nature. While it is difficult to measure a company’s ethical performance or corporate governance, which is coming under increased scrutiny, the extent to which an organisation meets its environmental targets can be quantified considering Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, the amount of green energy used and other metrics. The quality of data and their evaluation is a crucial issue, which, at QFinLab – the Quantitative Finance Lab of the Department of Mathematics at Politecnico di Milano – we are addressing through our ESG Corporate Data, which focuses on companies listed in the Italian stock exchange. The initiative aims to provide a repository of ESG data for the Italian market with reliable information and an annual report exploring key trends in the ESG transition.

The connection between the three dimensions of ESG and economic performance, moreover, is not well-established. This point is crucial, as a simple approach to ESG investing based, for instance, on the exclusion of certain sectors from the investment process – an approach very popular a few years ago – is no longer viable, in that it is in contrast with the mandatory duty of asset managers. A more suitable approach, which requires investors to estimate how the ESG profile of a company impacts its future economic performance, should aim to integrate ESG factors into the asset management process. Organisations, in other words, are grappling with the issue of double counting, in the sense of economic and ESG performance, which is not an easy challenge to address.

The multiple facets of climate risk

From an investment perspective, climate risk deserves special attention. It comes in two different forms: physical and

Japanese banks prepare for battle over directors’ climate qualifications

Standard DigitalWeekend Print + Standard Digital

wasnow $75 per month

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

What’s included

Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts10 monthly gift articles to shareGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionEverything in PrintWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisPlusEverything in Premium DigitalEverything in Standard DigitalGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresFirstFT newsletterVideos & PodcastsFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit app10 gift articles per monthExclusive FT analysisPremium newslettersFT Digital Edition10 additional gift articles per monthMake and share highlightsFT WorkspaceMarkets data widgetSubscription ManagerWorkflow integrationsOccasional readers go freeVolume discountFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Standard DigitalFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Premium Digital

Horses for Courses

Winning the renewables race is all about location, according to Richard Lum, Co-CIO, Victory Hill Capital Partners.

The transition to a low-carbon economy is creating a once-in-a-generation dislocation in energy markets, fundamentally bringing the longevity of current energy infrastructure into question. For example, whereas energy systems designed for oil, coal and gas were predicated on centralised power generation, there is now a burgeoning need to upgrade or reform power grids to a distributed model, accommodating the growth of renewable energy sources as we progress towards net zero goals.

This gap between legacy energy infrastructure and a sustainable, low-carbon future provides an opportunity for astute investors. But capitalising upon uncertainties like supply security and price volatility at peak times is not as simple as swapping every coal-powered energy plant for a wind farm. Globally, the energy transition is taking place at varying speeds in different locations, leading to profound differences in how renewables assets perform.

These differences are partly due to inherent regional characteristics that render some methods of clean energy generation more effective than others depending on where you are. For instance, France’s robust nuclear power infrastructure, supported by strong policy and regulation, has lessened the demand for new sources of renewable energy in its electricity grid. Or China, where expansive land mass and suitable climate conditions have allowed renewables developers to build 2,919GW of solar capacity.

But identifying beneficial investment opportunities requires more than locating wind farm projects where there is wind, and solar fields where there is sun, or ‘copying and pasting’ one lucrative project framework into regions with physical and regulatory similarities.

The value drivers are local

While a broadbrush approach to green infrastructure investment might go some way towards meeting global energy needs, the drivers of value are inherently local. Taking a broad approach could come at the cost of investor returns, ultimately jeopardising the long-term financing prospects for the transition. Investors will need to evaluate each project at a granular level, assessing its merits in consideration of its location by looking at everything from weather, geography, politics and regulation, to the stage of the energy transition journey that the country is currently in.

In other words, varying market conditions mean that to fruitfully participate in transition projects globally, investors must account for the fact that renewable technology will perform differently in different places, with direct knock-on effects on performance and investor returns.

A good example