Map: Where Are America’s Largest Landfills?

Published

39 seconds ago

on

May 26, 2024 Graphics/Design:

See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.

Map: Where Are America’s Largest Landfills?

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on Apple or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

We map out America’s largest landfills, based on their total capacity (measured in millions of tons) for solid waste. Data for this graphic is sourced from Statista and is current up to 2023.

According to the EPA, the U.S. produced 292 million tons of solid waste in 2018. Of that, about 150 million tons headed to the country’s landfills. It would take more than 600 of the largest cargo ships (by dead weight tonnage) to move this much material at once.

Ranked: America’s Largest Landfills

Opened in 1993 and located 25 minutes from Las Vegas, Apex Landfill is believed to be one of the world’s largest landfills by both area and volume.

It spans 1,900 acres, or roughly the size of 1,400 football fields. Given its vast capacity, the landfill is expected to be able to accept waste for over 250 years.

Here are the top 10 largest landfills in the country.

RankU.S. LandfillStateCapacity (Million Tons) 1Apex RegionalNevada995 2ECDC EnvironmentalUtah482 3Denver Arapahoe Disposal SiteColorado396 4Columbia RidgeOregon393 5Lockwood RegionalNevada346 6OkeechobeeFlorida242 7Butterfield StationArizona226 8Roosevelt Regional MSWWashington219 9Wasatch RegionalUtah203 10Hillsborough CountyFlorida203

In a 2021 PBS interview, a spokesperson for Apex Landfill reported that the facility captured and treated enough landfill gas to power nearly 11,000 homes in Southern Nevada.

In fact, landfills can create electricity through a process called landfill gas (LFG) recovery. When organic waste decomposes, it produces methane gas which can be captured and purified to create fuel for generators.

As it happens, methane gas from landfills is the third-largest source of human-related carbon emissions, equivalent to 24 million gas passenger vehicles driven for one year. Its capture and treatment is a significant opportunity to combat emissions.

Bill Gross says Trump would be worse for bond markets than Biden

Standard DigitalWeekend Print + Standard Digital

wasnow $85 per month

Billed Quarterly at $199. Complete digital access plus the FT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday.

What’s included

Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts10 monthly gift articles to shareGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionEverything in PrintWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisPlusEverything in Premium DigitalEverything in Standard DigitalGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresFirstFT newsletterVideos & PodcastsFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit app10 gift articles per monthExclusive FT analysisPremium newslettersFT Digital Edition10 additional gift articles per monthMake and share highlightsFT WorkspaceMarkets data widgetSubscription ManagerWorkflow integrationsOccasional readers go freeVolume discountFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Standard DigitalFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Premium Digital

Clarity? In this economy?

Malte Mueller | Fstop | Getty Images

Jim LaPointe knows that how the economy feels “depends on your perspective.”

Four years after Covid-19 lockdowns kicked off a home fix-up frenzy, the central New Jersey contractor’s business remains through the roof. While Home Depot said earlier this month that customers are increasingly holding off on big projects, LaPointe is seeing the opposite. He’s been turning some clients away to avoid being “booked up a year in advance.”

“They’re going nuts with this,” he said of homeowners’ appetite for renovations.

It wasn’t long ago when a stock market smashing records and unemployment at decadeslong lows were huge advantages for an incumbent president. But today, with voters heading to the polls in little more than five months, it’s less clear what role the economy will play in an electorate that’s also fractured by immigration and abortion rights.

An NBC News poll last month found cost-of-living concerns remain top of mind for voters. While presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump is seen — by a 52% to 30% margin — as better positioned to tackle inflation than his Democratic rival, President Joe Biden, 1 in 4 voters have yet to make up their minds about the race.

“We’re getting close to the period, usually in the summer, when public attitudes on the economy traditionally harden,” said Greg Valliere, chief U.S. policy strategist at AGF Investments, who so far sees Biden as “the clear underdog.”

The Biden campaign, which rejects that view, has been ramping up its economic messaging all year. It notes that the country dodged a much-forecast 2023 recession and weathered the Federal Reserve’s 11 interest rate hikes while continuing to add more jobs and small businesses.

The robust labor market and a Covid savings cushion mean many consumers continue to spend heavily, even those who face a budget squeeze elsewhere. That financial push-and-pull is still clouding — and in some cases distorting — many households’ view of an otherwise sunny economy, while leaving others more hopeful.

‘I can’t run on the hamster wheel fast enough’

Meg Thomann, a communications director for a pharmaceutical company, is one of Jim LaPointe’s customers. She and her husband, an architect, are renovating the historic home they share with their three kids. While they have the disposable income to do so, Thomann said it still “feels like I can’t run on the hamster wheel fast enough.”

In the middle of fixing her roof and preparing

CNBC

The Rise in America’s Billion-Dollar Extreme Weather Disasters

Published

18 seconds ago

on

May 26, 2024 Graphics & Design The Rise in U.S. Billion-Dollar Extreme Weather Disasters

Since 1980, there have been 383 extreme weather or climate disasters where the damages reached at least $1 billion. In total, these disasters have cost more than $2.7 trillion.

Created in partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, this chart shows how these disasters have been increasing with each passing decade.

A Growing Concern

The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) tracks each disaster and estimates the cost based on factors like physical damages and time losses such as business interruption. They adjust all costs by the Consumer Price Index to account for inflation.

DecadeTotal No. of EventsTotal Inflation-Adjusted Cost 1980s33$216B 1990s57$330B 2000s67$611B 2010s131$978B 2020s*95$568B

Both the number and cost of extreme weather disasters has grown over time. In fact, not even halfway through the 2020s the number of disasters is over 70% of those seen during the entire 2010s. 

Severe storms have been the most common, accounting for half of all billion-dollar disasters since 1980. In terms of costs, tropical cyclones have caused the lion’s share—more than 50% of the total. Hurricane Katrina, which made landfall in 2005, remains the most expensive single event with $199 billion in inflation-adjusted costs.

Electricity and Extreme Weather Disasters

With severe storms and other disasters rising, the electricity people rely on is significantly impacted. For instance, droughts have been associated with a decline in hydropower, which is an important source of U.S. renewable electricity generation

Disasters can also lead to significant costs for utility companies. Hawaii Electric faces $5 billion in potential damages claims for the 2023 wildfire, which is nearly eight times its insurance coverage. Lawsuits accuse the company of negligence in maintaining its infrastructure, such as failing to strengthen power poles to withstand high winds. 

Given that the utilities industry is facing the highest risk from extreme weather and climate disasters, some companies have begun to prepare for such events. This means taking steps like burying power lines, increasing insurance coverage, and upgrading infrastructure. 

You may also like

Cash discounts, while still rare, are up over 60% from 2015. Here’s how much you can save

More businesses are offering financial incentives to consumers who pay with cash rather than credit card. Consumers may save 2% to 4% on their purchase by using cash. They’ll also often save with a debit card, experts said. Businesses charge more for credit card purchases due to fees they incur per transaction. Ryanjlane | E+ | Getty Images

Sometimes, it pays to pay with cash.  

More merchants are offering a lower price to customers who use cash rather than credit card for a purchase. That means opting for paper over plastic may save you money in some cases.

Just how much?

Typically, cash discounts run about 2% to 4% on purchases, though savings can be higher, experts said.

The share of cash payments with a discount is still low — in fact, only about 3% of all cash payments in 2022, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

However, that share is up more than 60% from 2015, when 1.8% of all cash transactions had a discount, Atlanta Fed data shows. While not yet the norm, cash incentives are likely to become more widespread, experts said.

Meanwhile, other businesses add a surcharge when customers use credit cards for purchases. In such cases, paying with cash would also yield savings.

Nearly 7 in 10 cardholders said a business has charged them extra for paying with a credit card, according to a recent LendingTree survey.

The trend comes as consumers have steadily shifted away from using cash for purchases: Consumers made 18% of payments with cash in 2022, down from 31% in 2016, according to the Federal Reserve. Meanwhile, credit cards’ share grew to 31% from 18% during that period.

More from Personal Finance:
How many credit cards should you have?
People hate budgeting. Here’s how to reframe it
The myth about credit cards and credit scores that’s costing you

“Sometimes, it can make sense to just go ahead and pay cash,” said Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree.

That may be the case even after accounting for credit card rewards, Schulz said. The largest general cash-back return on most credit cards is 2%, for example — a percentage often exceeded by cash discounts, he said.

“If the merchant establishes a discount that’s high

CNBC

Chinese companies are looking overseas for growth. Morgan Stanley says this is the stock to play the trend

Visualizing Daily Protein Sources by Region

Published

18 seconds ago

on

May 25, 2024 Article/Editing: Graphics/Design:

See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.

Visualizing Daily Protein Sources by Region

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Protein plays a vital role in creating and maintaining every cell in our bodies.

This graphic breaks down how people in different regions of the world get their protein intake. The figures come from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO), accessed via Our World in Data.

The figures we present here reflect the distribution of daily protein intake across regions, with each region’s total adding up to 100%. It’s important to note that this is distinct from the actual amount of protein consumed per person, often measured in grams.

Developed Countries Have More Access to Meat and Dairy

Protein has many benefits for our bodies. It is a building block of bones, muscles, cartilage, and skin. Our hair and nails are comprised mostly of protein. It is also used to repair tissue, oxygenate the body, and make enzymes, which aid in digesting food.

People in more developed regions (like North America or Europe) get a larger share of their daily protein from meat and dairy.

RegionPlant protein (%)Meat (%)Dairy (%)Seafood (%)Eggs (%) Africa77.212.15.44.21.1 Asia65.115.77.87.44.0 South America41.339.012.62.94.2 Europe40.429.520.75.53.9 Oceania39.538.813.56.12.1 North America37.238.416.03.94.5

When only considering meat, South America, with big producers like Brazil and Argentina, takes the lead as the most important protein source.

Meanwhile, Asia, with top fish producers China and India, leads in protein intake from seafood.

In Africa, where many developing countries in the world are located, plant protein is the most important protein source for the population.